Skip to main content
CoinPulse AU
30 June 2026AI summary

Singapore's Hyperliquid warning, Indonesia's FinFluencer licence: Asia Express

AI-summarised from reporting by Cointelegraph. How we use AI.

Singapore's Hyperliquid warning, Indonesia's FinFluencer licence: Asia Express

What happened

The financial regulators in Singapore, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), recently added the decentralised perpetual exchange Hyperliquid to its Investor Alert List. This follows a similar move earlier this year where another prominent cryptocurrency exchange, Bybit, was also placed on the same list. The MAS Investor Alert List serves to warn consumers about unregulated entities that may be, or have been, wrongly perceived as being licensed or regulated by the MAS. Such inclusions indicate that these platforms are operating outside the regulatory framework established by Singaporean authorities for financial services.

The regulatory scrutiny in Southeast Asia extends beyond Singapore. Indonesia, for instance, is moving towards a new regulatory framework concerning how financial products, including cryptocurrencies, are promoted. The Indonesian Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (Bappebti) is reportedly developing a scheme to certify social media influencers who promote crypto assets. This initiative aims to professionalise crypto promotion and ensure that individuals providing financial advice or marketing investment products do so under a regulated banner. The move is designed to protect consumers by ensuring that promotional content is accurate, fair, and not misleading, thereby reducing the risks associated with unchecked financial endorsements on social media.

These developments signify a growing trend across various Asian jurisdictions to bring the burgeoning crypto market under a more structured regulatory umbrella. Regulators are increasingly focusing on consumer protection and market integrity, addressing issues from unlicensed operations to the responsible advertising of digital assets. The actions taken by both Singapore and Indonesia reflect a proactive approach to managing the risks and opportunities presented by the rapid expansion of the cryptocurrency ecosystem in their respective countries. For the crypto industry, these regulatory shifts highlight the increasing importance of compliance and transparent operations.

Why it matters for Australian investors

The regulatory actions taken by Singapore and Indonesia, though geographically distant, offer significant insights and potential implications for Australian investors. Australia's own regulatory bodies, such as the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC), are continually assessing the cryptocurrency landscape. While Australia has its own unique regulatory environment, decisions made in other developed markets, especially within the Asia-Pacific region, often influence local regulatory discourse and future directions.

For Australian investors engaging with international crypto platforms, these warnings from Singapore serve as a critical reminder regarding due diligence. Many Australian investors often use offshore exchanges for a variety of reasons, including access to a wider range of tokens or specific trading features. The MAS alert regarding Hyperliquid and Bybit underscores the inherent risks of using platforms not subject to robust local regulation. Should an issue arise with an unregulated entity, Australian investors may have limited recourse or protection compared to using Australian-regulated exchanges like CoinSpot, Independent Reserve, Swyftx, or BTC Markets.

Furthermore, Indonesia's approach to regulating 'finfluencers' could foreshadow similar discussions within Australia. ASIC has previously issued warnings and guidance to financial influencers, emphasising that providing financial product advice without an Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence is illegal. The structured approach being developed in Indonesia could provide a blueprint or at least fuel further consideration by Australian regulators on how best to manage the burgeoning trend of crypto promotion on social media, thereby impacting how Australian investors receive information about digital assets.

Considering these international trends, Australian investors are encouraged to prioritise the use of platforms that comply with Australian laws. This includes understanding the tax implications, as clarified by the ATO, and ensuring that any platform used adheres to AUSTRAC's anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) obligations. Such vigilance helps protect investors from financial crime and ensures compliance with Australian reporting requirements.

Impact on the AUD market

The direct impact of Singapore's and Indonesia's regulatory actions on the Australian dollar (AUD) cryptocurrency market is likely to be indirect rather than immediate or substantial. While these regulatory moves don't directly affect the AUD's value against other fiat currencies or the pricing of crypto assets on Australian exchanges, they contribute to a broader global narrative of increasing crypto regulation. This narrative can influence investor sentiment and potentially impact capital flows into the broader crypto market, which in turn might trickle down to AUD-denominated crypto trading pairs.

Increased regulatory clarity and enforcement overseas can sometimes lead to an overall cooling effect on speculation, nudging more investors towards regulated and compliant platforms. For the AUD crypto market, this might mean a gradual shift where Australian investors become more conscious of sovereign regulatory environments, potentially reducing their exposure to unregulated offshore entities in favour of Australian-based and regulated services. Such a shift could incrementally bolster the liquidity and trading volumes on Australian exchanges, as domestic users consolidate their activity within local jurisdictions.

Conversely, a global trend of stricter regulation, if perceived broadly as stifling innovation or opportunity, could dampen overall enthusiasm for crypto. This, while not directly tied to the AUD, could influence the demand for crypto assets transacted against the AUD. However, the more likely scenario is that a push for clearer regulation globally will ultimately be seen as a positive for long-term market stability, fostering greater institutional and retail investor confidence. This confidence could indirectly benefit compliant local markets, including those dealing in AUD crypto pairs.

Ultimately, the AUD market is influenced by a complex interplay of international and domestic factors. While Singapore's and Indonesia's actions are part of the international regulatory mosaic, their primary significance for the AUD market lies in their contribution to the evolving understanding of 'what good regulation looks like' for digital assets, which in the long run could foster a more mature and resilient local ecosystem.

What to watch next

Looking ahead, Australian investors and market participants should closely monitor how these regulatory trends evolve, particularly within the Asia-Pacific region. The sustained focus by authorities like Singapore's MAS on warning against unregulated entities suggests a continued effort to delineate between legitimate, compliant operations and those operating outside established frameworks. We can expect more jurisdictions to refine their approaches to consumer protection, potentially expanding their 'naughty lists' or similar warning mechanisms.

Indonesia's move to certify finfluencers marks a significant precedent that could inspire other nations to address the issue of unregulated financial advice on social media. It would be prudent to watch if countries like Australia, with its existing ASIC guidelines for financial influencers, adopt more formal certification schemes or stricter enforcement mechanisms for crypto promotion. This could significantly alter how crypto projects and exchanges market themselves to the Australian public, steering away from informal endorsements towards more professional, regulated channels.

Furthermore, keep an eye on international cooperation among financial regulators. As crypto assets transcend national borders, coordinated international efforts to set standards for licensing, data sharing, and enforcement could become more prevalent. Such collaboration could lead to a more harmonised global regulatory landscape, which, while complex to implement, might ultimately benefit market stability and investor confidence worldwide, including for those trading in AUD.

For Australian investors, staying informed about these global and regional regulatory shifts is crucial for making informed decisions about platform choice, investment risk, and compliance with Australian tax and financial laws. Continued education and reliance on trusted, regulated entities remain key strategies in navigating the ever-changing cryptocurrency market. The proactive steps taken in Singapore and Indonesia serve as a valuable indicator of the increasing maturity and regulatory complexity of the global digital asset ecosystem.

Mentioned in this story

Coins covered

FAQ

Common questions

Why should Australian investors care about Singapore's MAS warnings?

Australian investors should care because many use offshore platforms for crypto trading. Singapore's warnings about unregulated entities like Hyperliquid and Bybit highlight the risks involved with platforms not subject to local Australian regulation. If issues arise with an unregulated entity, Australian investors may have limited avenues for recourse or protection compared to using ASIC-compliant Australian exchanges.

How might Indonesia's 'finfluencer' scheme affect Australian crypto promotion?

Indonesia's scheme to certify crypto finfluencers could influence how Australia's ASIC approaches financial promotion on social media. While ASIC already regulates financial advice, a formal certification model in a neighbouring country could prompt Australian regulators to consider stricter measures or more formal licensing for individuals who promote crypto assets, impacting how information reaches Australian investors.

What regulatory differences exist between Australia and Singapore regarding crypto?

Both Australia and Singapore are working to regulate crypto, but their approaches differ. Singapore's MAS is known for its robust licensing regime for digital payment token service providers and its direct investor alert list for unregulated entities. Australia, through ASIC and AUSTRAC, focuses on consumer protection, AML/CTF obligations, and ensuring those providing financial advice are licensed, without a direct equivalent for Singapore's extensive 'alert list'. However, both share the common goal of market integrity and investor protection.

Source excerpt

Explore how Singapore's Hyperliquid warning and Indonesia's 'finfluencer' scheme impact Australian crypto investors and the AUD market. Stay informed with Coi

Read the original on Cointelegraph

About this article: this is an AI-generated summary of reporting by Cointelegraph. It has not been reviewed by a human editor. We use AI to localise crypto news for Australian readers, and we link back to the original source so you can verify the facts.

Informational only — not financial advice. Always do your own research. Read our AI & editorial policy →

← Back to all news