OpenAI and Anthropic now sit at the center of Big Tech’s AI cloud backlog
The artificial intelligence (AI) boom is capturing the financial world's attention, yet a critical question is emerging regarding the true nature of the capital flowing into leading AI powerhouses like OpenAI and Anthropic. Recent financial disclosures reveal that these two companies are intricately linked to a substantial portion of the future cloud revenue reported by major tech entities such as Microsoft, Oracle, Alphabet, and Amazon. This dynamic has sparked concerns reminiscent of past market exuberances.
At its core, the issue revolves around a circular financial arrangement: a tech giant invests billions in an AI startup, often not just in cash but significantly in cloud credits. The AI startup then uses these credits to purchase cloud infrastructure and services from the very same tech giant. This effectively means the 'investment' flows out from the big tech company and returns to it as 'revenue' from its cloud division. While this superficially inflates both the AI startup's funding and the tech giant's cloud sales figures, it raises questions about the genuine economic activity involved.
What happened
Recent financial filings have highlighted a peculiar funding model intertwining major tech companies and prominent AI startups. Microsoft's significant investment in OpenAI, amounting to nearly $13 billion, serves as a prime example. This investment was predominantly comprised of Azure credits, rather than solely cash. OpenAI subsequently utilised these credits to power its AI model development and operations on Microsoft's Azure cloud infrastructure, thereby generating revenue for Microsoft.
Similarly, Anthropic has engaged in a comparable arrangement with Amazon. Over a nine-month period, Anthropic’s expenditure on Amazon Web Services (AWS) amounted to approximately $2.66 billion. This figure was roughly equivalent to its revenue during that time, indicating that a substantial portion of its incoming funds was immediately cycled back to AWS. Oracle also demonstrates a significant reliance on OpenAI, with over half of its $553 billion future pipeline tied to the AI developer.
This interconnected financial structure allows the investing tech giants to inflate the value of their stakes in these AI firms without actual product sales or direct cash inflows. For instance, Alphabet's first-quarter earnings in 2026 reportedly included $28.7 billion from its stake in Anthropic, while Amazon's earnings for the same period included $16.8 billion from its Anthropic holdings. This suggests 'paper gains' that boost reported profits, even as Amazon's free cash flow faced a significant 95% reduction, alongside massive investments in physical data centres.
Why it matters for Australian investors
For Australian investors observing the global tech landscape, these developments could have several implications. While direct impacts on Australian publicly listed companies might be limited, the broader health of global tech giants affects the investment portfolios of many Australians, particularly those with exposure to international equities through superannuation funds or direct investments in US-listed tech stocks. The sustainability of these 'paper gains' versus tangible cash flow is a vital consideration.
Furthermore, the Australian crypto market, though distinct, is not immune to sentiment shifts in the broader tech sector. A potential re-evaluation of AI startup valuations could trigger broader market volatility, influencing investor confidence in high-growth, technology-adjacent assets. Australian crypto exchanges like CoinSpot, Independent Reserve, Swyftx, and BTC Markets might observe impacts on trading volumes or investor behaviour if global tech sentiment turns sour. Australians, like other global investors, are increasingly looking for transparent and genuinely value-accretive investments.
Concentration risk is another key concern. Microsoft's nearly 49% future backlog dependence on OpenAI, and Oracle's 54% reliance, highlight significant vulnerabilities. Should OpenAI face challenges, the repercussions for these tech behemoths could be substantial. Australian investors need to assess if their exposure to global tech funds or individual stocks adequately accounts for such intertwined dependencies and potential risks. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) often advises investors to consider diversification and understand the underlying economics of their investments, principles that are particularly relevant here.
Impact on the AUD market
The most immediate impact on the Australian dollar (AUD) market is likely to be indirect, stemming from global investor confidence and capital flows. If large international tech companies face increased scrutiny over their AI investments, it could lead to broader risk aversion in global markets. This sentiment shift might see investors move towards 'safe-haven' assets, potentially impacting the AUD as capital flows are redirected.
Conversely, a perception of inflated valuations or unsustainable growth models within the global tech sector could temper the overall appetite for risk assets, including cryptocurrencies traded against the AUD. While the AUD market is primarily driven by commodity prices, interest rate differentials, and global economic health, significant shifts in major economic sectors like tech can create ripple effects.
Any substantial downturn in the growth trajectory of these global tech powerhouses could affect the performance of large Australian institutional investors that hold significant international equity positions, indirectly influencing domestic financial markets and potentially the AUD. However, it's crucial to distinguish between accounting profits and real cash generation, a lesson often reinforced by regulatory bodies like the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) in their guidance on financial reporting and taxation, albeit in a different context. Regulators globally, including AUSTRAC, are keenly watching how new technologies and their financing impact financial stability.
What to watch next
Australian investors should closely monitor several key indicators. Firstly, observe the financial reporting of major tech companies for any changes in how 'cloud backlog' and AI-related revenue are presented. Increased transparency regarding the cash component versus credit-based transactions will be crucial. Pay attention to how these companies discuss their free cash flow, not just reported profits, as the distinction between the two has become remarkably clear.
Secondly, keep an eye on regulatory developments globally. Regulators in major financial centres may begin to scrutinise these intertwined financial arrangements, potentially leading to new reporting standards or even investigations. Any such actions could re-evaluate the accounting practices currently permitted, influencing valuations across the board. While the initial events of the dot-com era saw regulatory bodies clarify what constitutes legitimate revenue, the parallels here suggest similar oversight might be warranted.
Finally, assess the longevity and the genuine innovation emerging from these AI ventures. If the underlying AI models create substantial, independent revenue streams that aren't solely reliant on circular funding from their investors, it could validate the current valuations. However, if the current structure persists or expands without true economic substance, it might signal an impending correction, much like the 'fibre capacity swaps' that plagued telecommunications companies in the early 2000s, leading to significant write-downs and bankruptcies. Understanding the true drivers of value will be paramount for Australian investors navigating this evolving tech landscape.
Coins covered
Common questions
How does the OpenAI and Microsoft funding model affect my Australian superannuation fund if it invests globally?
If your Australian superannuation fund has exposure to international tech stocks, particularly giants like Microsoft or Amazon, these funding models could influence the perceived value and stability of those investments. Over-reliance on 'paper gains' and circular funding could introduce a greater risk of volatility or re-evaluation in the future, potentially impacting your superannuation's performance, especially if a significant portion of its portfolio is allocated to these companies.
Are there any equivalent 'circular funding' concerns in the Australian crypto market or for Aussie tech startups?
While the specific scale and structure of these AI-tech giant arrangements are unique, the Australian crypto market and tech startup scene are not immune to questions about valuation and genuine economic activity. Investors in smaller, emerging projects, whether in crypto or traditional tech, should always assess the underlying business fundamentals, revenue sources, and funding structures to ensure they are based on sustainable growth rather than speculative or circular capital flows. AUSTRAC and ASIC maintain oversight to ensure market integrity within their respective purviews.
What should Australian investors look for to identify genuine growth versus 'paper gains' in tech investments?
Australian investors should focus on several key financial metrics beyond just reported profits. Look closely at free cash flow generation, which indicates genuine cash available after expenses and capital expenditures. Analyse the actual revenue streams – are they from diverse, independent customers, or heavily reliant on interconnected funding from a single investor? Scrutinise the cost structure, particularly in cloud-intensive businesses, and consider if the core technology creates demonstrable value that attracts real-world adoption and independent revenue, rather than just credit-based transactions.
New revelations uncover how OpenAI and Anthropic's funding from Big Tech relies on 'cloud credits', raising dot-com era concerns. CoinPulse AU analyses potent